There is an example of a Safe Harbor decision regarding the European Data Protection Directive. The Directive provides for relatively strict data protection rules for EU citizens. It prohibits European companies from transferring personal data to foreign jurisdictions with weaker data protection laws. Five years later, a decision created exceptions when foreign recipients of the data voluntarily agreed to comply with EU standards under the safe harbor`s international privacy principles. In October 2015, following a court ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union, the SAFE Harbor agreement between the EU and the US was declared invalid on the grounds that the US does not offer an equally adequate level of protection against surveillance of the data transferred to it. In return, THE FWS or NOAA promises not to require additional conservation or other activities on the property without the owner`s consent. At the end of the contract, the landowner is allowed to return the landscape to its original state if he wishes.  For example, in the context of a law that requires drivers not to “drive recklessly,” a clauseiculating that “driving within 25 miles per hour is conclusively considered reckless driving” is a “safe haven.” Similarly, a clause stating that “driving more than 90 miles per hour is conclusively considered reckless driving” would be a “dangerous safe haven.” In this example, driving would be between 25 miles per hour and 90 miles per hour outside of a safe port or unsafe port, which would be deemed by the vague standard “reckless.” Shelters can create specific rules that are inadvertently enforced. For example, driving at less than 25 miles per hour in a 60 MPH zone, if traffic or other conditions do not require it, could be reckless driving. The Safe Harbor Privacy Principles were developed between 1998 and 2000. They are designed to prevent private organizations within the European Union or the United States that store customer data from accidentally disclosing or losing personal data. U.S.
companies could opt for a program and be certified if they adhere to seven principles and 15 frequently asked questions and answers under the directive.  In July 2000, the European Commission decided that US companies that comply with the principles and register their certification that they meet EU requirements, the “safe harbor system”, can transfer data from the EU to the US. This is called a Safe Harbor decision.  An example of a safe harbor is the conduct of a Phase I environmental site assessment by a property purchaser, which results in due diligence and a safe harbor outcome if future contamination by a previous owner is detected. .